36502 Income Statistics
Comparison to Surrounding Areas
36502 Median Household Income
The median household income ($44,360) for 36502 is less than the median household income for 36579 ($74,375), 36475 ($45,039), 36480 ($49,342), 32568 ($79,279), 36426 ($51,417), 36441 ($50,349), Escambia County ($48,225), and Baldwin County ($78,775). But it's more than 36562 ($38,094), 36503 ($-1), 36543 ($-1), 36550 ($-1), 32535 ($38,618), 36445 ($39,421), Monroe County ($42,292), Conecuh County ($41,327), and Atmore city ($38,862).
| 36502 | $44,360 |
| Atmore city | $38,862 |
| Baldwin County | $78,775 |
| Conecuh County | $41,327 |
| Escambia County | $48,225 |
| Monroe County | $42,292 |
Get Median Household Income for all Zip Codes in Alabama.
36502 Average Household Income
The average household income ($57,750) for 36502 is less than the average household income for 36579 ($88,793), 36441 ($82,320), 36475 ($72,903), 36480 ($75,065), 36550 ($65,978), 32568 ($97,744), 36426 ($67,528), Conecuh County ($61,420), Escambia County ($63,473), Monroe County ($58,409), and Baldwin County ($103,378). But it's more than 32535 ($53,114), 36445 ($57,564), 36503 ($-1), 36543 ($-1), 36562 ($54,640), and Atmore city ($52,436).
| 36502 | $57,750 |
| Atmore city | $52,436 |
| Baldwin County | $103,378 |
| Conecuh County | $61,420 |
| Escambia County | $63,473 |
| Monroe County | $58,409 |
Get Average Household Income for all Zip Codes in Alabama.
36502 Per-Capita Income
The per-capita income for 36502 is $23,040. The per capita income ($23,040) for 36502 is less than the per capita income for 36579 ($31,612), 36426 ($25,315), 36441 ($29,181), 36475 ($32,794), 36480 ($30,755), 32568 ($36,515), Conecuh County ($26,417), Escambia County ($23,983), Monroe County ($23,812), and Baldwin County ($42,357). But it's more than 36503 ($3,292), 32535 ($17,280), 36445 ($21,986), 36562 ($23,030), 36543 ($-1), 36550 ($20,549), and Atmore city ($18,660).
| 36502 | $23,040 |
| Atmore city | $18,660 |
| Baldwin County | $42,357 |
| Conecuh County | $26,417 |
| Escambia County | $23,983 |
| Monroe County | $23,812 |
Get Per-Capita Income for all Zip Codes in Alabama.
36502 High Income Households
2.2% of households make over $200,000 a year. The percent high income households (2.2%) for 36502 is less than the percent high income households for 36579 (3.8%), 36475 (2.6%), 36480 (5.9%), 36550 (8.7%), 32568 (11.8%), 36426 (3.6%), 36441 (5.6%), Conecuh County (4.6%), Escambia County (3.1%), and Baldwin County (10.4%). But it's more than 36445 (1.0%), 36543 (0.0%), 36562 (1.2%), 32535 (0.3%), 36503 (-1.0%), Monroe County (1.7%), and Atmore city (1.5%).
| 36502 | 2.2% |
| Atmore city | 1.5% |
| Baldwin County | 10.4% |
| Conecuh County | 4.6% |
| Escambia County | 3.1% |
| Monroe County | 1.7% |
Get High Income Households for all Zip Codes in Alabama.
36502 Median Household Income by Age of Householder
| under 25 years | 25 to 44 years | 45 to 64 years | 65 years and over | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36502 | $-1 | $45,833 | $41,031 | $42,156 |
| Atmore city | $121,066 | $-1 | $21,667 | $48,388 |
| Baldwin County | $32,882 | $87,057 | $94,226 | $60,574 |
| Conecuh County | $2,499 | $42,129 | $47,742 | $36,109 |
| Escambia County | $60,513 | $55,745 | $50,902 | $40,882 |
| Monroe County | $23,783 | $56,743 | $53,828 | $33,537 |
Get Median Household Income by Age of Householder for all Zip Codes in Alabama.
Find More Zip Codes Like 36502
Use our lookalike & filtering workflow to discover every zip that matches your ideal market profile.
Stop researching one zip code at a time.
Our Income By Zip Code Lists let you start with a zip like 36502, then automatically find hundreds of similar zips by income, demographics, and growth potential — so you can build a smarter target list in minutes.
- Don't waste 40 high-value hours digging through the US Census Bureau's website
- Up-to-date data
- Easy to analyze
- Invest your time in your new customers
Get Your Income By Zip Code List
Get all zip codes in a state or the entire US with data such as median household income.
Starting at $65.
